Operations on Complex Numbers
Complex numbers are "binomials" of a sort, and are
added, subtracted, and multiplied in a similar way. (Division, which is
further down the page, is a bit different.)
For
this last example, if you learned "FOIL", FOILing works for this kind
of multiplication. But whatever method you use, remember that
multiplying and adding with complexes works just like multiplying and
adding polynomials, except that, while x2 is just x2, i2 is –1. That is,
you can use the exact same techniques for simplifying complex-number
expressions, but you can simplify even further with complexes than with
polynomials, because i2 reduces to the number –1.
Adding
and multiplying complexes isn't too bad. It's when you start on
fractions (that is, division) that things turn ugly. Most of the reason
for this ugliness is actually arbitrary. Remember back in elementary
school, when you first learned fractions? Your teacher would get her
panties in a wad if you used "improper" fractions. For instance, you
couldn't say " 3/2 "; you had to convert it to "1 1/2". But now that
you're in algebra, nobody cares, and you've probably noticed that
"improper" fractions are often more useful than "mixed" fractions. The
problem in the case of complexes is that your professor will get his
boxers in a bunch if you leave imaginaries in the denominator. So how do
you handle this?
Suppose you have the following problem:
The
point here is that they want you to get rid of the i underneath. The 2
is fine, but the i has got to go. To do this, you use the fact that i2 =
–1. If you multiply top and bottom by i, then the i underneath will
vanish in a puff of negativity:
This was simple enough, but what if you have something more complicated?
Since
you still have an i underneath, this didn't help much. So how do you
handle this simplification? You use something called "conjugates". The
conjugate of a complex number a + bi is the same number, but with the
opposite sign in the middle: a – bi. When you multiply conjugates, you
are, in effect, multiplying to a difference of squares:
Note that the i's disappeared. This is what the conjugate, difference-of-squares thing is for. Here's how it is used:
In
the last step, note how the fraction was split into two pieces. This is
because, technically speaking, a complex number is in two parts, the
real part and the i part. They aren't supposed to "share" the
denominator.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.